Dewstack vs Confluence: Documentation Platform Comparison
Compare Dewstack and Confluence side-by-side. See how these documentation platforms differ in features, pricing, and capabilities.
Dewstack vs Confluence
Looking for a Confluence alternative for customer-facing docs? Here's an honest comparison.
Overview
| Aspect | Dewstack | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Customer-facing documentation | Internal team wikis |
| Pricing Model | Flat monthly | Per user |
| Public Sites | Built-in, beautiful | Requires configuration |
| Atlassian Ecosystem | No | Yes (Jira, Trello) |
| AI Capabilities | Extensive | Limited |
Pricing Comparison
| Plan | Dewstack | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | 7-day trial | Yes (up to 10 users) |
| Entry Paid | $39/mo (Starter) | $6.05/user/mo |
| 10-Person Team | $89/mo (Pro) | ~$60.50/mo |
| 25-Person Team | Custom | ~$151/mo |
Confluence's per-user pricing scales with team size. Dewstack's flat pricing stays predictable.
Feature Comparison
Content Creation
| Feature | Dewstack | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Rich text editor | Yes (WYSIWYG) | Yes |
| AI documentation creation (upload doc, get docs) | Yes | No |
| AI template creation (describe, get structure) | Yes | No |
| Page Assist (AI-powered editing) | Yes | Limited (Atlassian Intelligence) |
| Screen capture to docs | Yes (Doc Sync) | No |
| Templates | Yes | Yes (extensive library) |
| Macros/Widgets | Limited | Yes (extensive) |
Customer-Facing Features
| Feature | Dewstack | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Beautiful public doc site | Yes (built-in) | Requires setup |
| AI chatbot for users | Yes (SmartDocs) | No |
| User feedback collection | Yes | Needs apps |
| SEO optimization | Yes | Limited |
| Custom domain | Yes (free SSL) | No (Cloud) |
Access & Permissions
| Feature | Dewstack | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Collection-level access control | Yes | Space-level |
| Role-based permissions | Yes | Yes (detailed) |
| Guest access | Yes | Yes |
Content Ingestion
| Feature | Dewstack | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Browser extension (capture web content) | Yes | No |
| Bulk import (ZIP with PDF, DOCX, MD, HTML) | Yes | Limited |
| CSV/data file import | Yes | No |
| Import from Confluence | Yes | N/A |
| AI structures imported content | Yes | No |
| Jira integration | Yes (import) | Yes (native, deep) |
| Slack integration | Yes | Limited |
| Self-hosted option | No | Yes (Data Center) |
Customization
| Feature | Dewstack | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Landing page customization | Yes (full DIY) | Limited |
| Branding | Yes | Yes |
| Custom CSS | Limited | Yes (with apps) |
Analytics & Insights
| Feature | Dewstack | Confluence |
|---|---|---|
| Page views & unique visitors | Yes | Yes |
| Search analytics | Yes | Limited |
| Content health scoring (AI) | Yes | No |
| Reader feedback tracking | Yes | Needs apps |
| AI content insights | Yes | No |
| Historical data (up to 180 days) | Yes | Limited |
| Zero-result search detection | Yes | No |
What Sets Dewstack Apart
For teams comparing against Confluence specifically:
- Ingest content from anywhere - Browser extension, CSV, PDF, Word, Confluence export. Aggregate scattered content into one place.
- AI makes sense of it - AI structures and organizes imported content. Perfect for migrating messy Confluence spaces.
- Internal + external hosting - Same platform serves your team and your customers. Confluence is internal-first.
- Collection-level access - Control which clients see which documentation based on their plan or relationship.
- Predictable pricing - Flat monthly vs per-user costs that grow with your team.
Where Confluence Excels
- Atlassian ecosystem - Native Jira, Trello, and Bitbucket integration. If you're already in Atlassian, it's seamless.
- Internal wikis - Built for team collaboration, institutional knowledge, and internal processes.
- Macros and widgets - Extensive library for embedding content, diagrams, and dynamic elements.
- Self-hosted option - Data Center deployment for organizations with strict data residency requirements.
- Permissions depth - Granular space, page, and user-level permissions.
The Bottom Line
Confluence is an excellent internal wiki, especially for teams already using Jira and other Atlassian products. Its macro system and deep integrations make it powerful for internal documentation. Dewstack takes a different approach: ingest content from anywhere (browser extension, CSV, documents, Confluence itself), let AI structure it, and host it for internal teams or external customers. If you need an internal wiki with deep Atlassian integration, Confluence is hard to beat. If you want to aggregate content from multiple sources and serve both internal and external audiences, Dewstack is built for that.
Ready to Switch to Dewstack?
Join thousands of teams creating beautiful, AI-powered documentation.
- 7-day free trial
- No credit card required
- Cancel anytime